Family Court Reform Coalition - Kansas, Missouri Chapter

Crisis in the Family Courts; Our Children at Risk!

KS-FCRC (home)     KS OUTRAGEOUS Tragedies     BAD BAD Judges     Shawnee Co.     GAL's MHP's     NCADV-Rihanna     Sedgwick County     Inspire, Dreams, Hope     Site Map      
“The ultimate tragedy is not the oppression and cruelty by the bad people- but the silence over that by the good people.”  

Martin Luther King, Jr.

 

 

 

 

 

 

 

We are JUDGE$- We have complete 'GOD power$ - we are  immune - 

no one can stop us

NO ONE!

(and dip $hit here) -Is covering OUR corrupt A$$E$

 

 

Speaker of the House
Michael R. O'Neal
(R-KS-104th)     

    

Why is Mike holding back on 'subpoena' powers into the corrupt Judiciary??

There is only one reason 'We the people'... know-

 "STOP PROTECTING THE CORRUPT JUDICIARY MIKE O'NEAL!!

 

 

Give 'subpoena' power back (to what ALREADY should be 'OPEN RECORDS') to ANY 'investigative' entity- into the Kansas "merit" Judges- to the hundreds of 'complaints' filed with the senate and house testifying to and with evidence and FACT of BRIBES, CORRUPTION, PROFITEERING, RICCO, RAQUETTERING and....(the list goes on and on) Color of Law

Mike O'Neal would rather let your daughters be raped-

"We.." would rather the jail beds be saved for those who profit$ on 'victims' -the legislative judiciary.

 

 

 

From: Marlene Jones

Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 9:29 AM

To: ‘Un-disclosed recipients’

Subject: specical prosecutor

 

The first amendment gives me the right to petition the government for a redress of grievances and guarantees me the right to ask the United States government to provide relief for the violations of rule of law that have been committed by governmental actions in Sedgwick County and the State of Kansas.  I am invoking that right.

 

SPECIAL PROSECUTOR

 

 

 

From: AngelFury@AngelFury.org [mailto:AngelFury@AngelFury.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 8:38 PM
To: 'Marlene Jones'
Subject: RE: Fw: re:child trafficking

 

Go get em mamaJones !` very kewl

 

 

From: Marlene Jones [mailto:jonesma@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 8:32 PM
To: AngelFury@AngelFury.org
Subject: Fw: Fw: re:child trafficking

 

This is what I just received from Senator Nancy Schaefer  -out of Georgia - you probably remember her - I've spoken with her this last year - CPS in her state had put a lot of money supporting someone to run against her because she has gone to Washington DC and spoken about the atrocities committed by CPS. I think that she was beat out this last year - I still stay in touch - she will continue her work in DC regardless.

http://fightcps.com/2008/02/29/report-of-georgia-senator-nancy-schaefer-on-cps-corruption/

Marlene

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Nancy Schaefer

To: Marlene Jones

Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 4:39 PM

Subject: Re: Fw: re:child trafficking

 

Hello Marlene,

You are correct.

Keep fighting!! Stay strong.

We will win.

The timing is right.

Blessings,

Nancy Schaefer

On Sun, Feb 15, 2009 at 7:45 PM, Marlene Jones <jonesma@sbcglobal.net> wrote:

 

Senator Nancy Schaefer

What is happening in our country is "child trafficking" When there is money or incentives paid to states or agencies to knowingly remove children on falsified doucments(which is happening in our state - especially our county) that is "child trafficking". Child removal has become big business and big income for the priviatization contractors.

They are not following the law in the removal of children.  We have filed "Medicaid fraud" with Daniel Levinson of the Inspector General's office.

We are now going to file a complaint with the US Attorney General's office and request that a "Special Prosecutor" be brought to the state of Kansas.

If necessary - we will file a complaint of "human & child trafficking" with the United Nations.

Keep the faith - I am

We're going to win!!!! We're not stopping until we do.

Marlene

316-729-7727

 

 

 

CPS engages in for-profit crimes against humanity consequent to the unlawful dismemberment of families to create human trafficking victims from which the County earns Federal funds with which to fund it's operations. The exploitation of men, women and children for financial gain is the definition of human trafficking, which the U.S. Secretary of State Condolleza Rice states is a modern day form of slavery. usinfo.state.gov/gi/global_issues/human_trafficking.html

 

Child Protective Services, in taking children who do not meet the statutory definition of abuse or neglect from loving homes is creating more throwaway children than they are legitimately saving. CPS actors merely decide that children are at risk and that abuse or neglect may occur in the FUTURE. These are POLICE  

STATE TACTICS that are routinely deployed against citizens of totalitarian regimes. What happened to due process? What happened to the Constitution of the United States of America? Where is the Bill of Rights? Dismembering families and creating artificial orphans by means of fraud and/or deceptive trade practices is NOT legitimate government business.

 

CPS is part of a $14. billion dollar a year, tax payer fueled, child abuse industrial complex which provides jobs for caseworkers, judges, lawyers, bailiffs, various court personnel, psychotherapists, foster homes, pharmaceutical vendors and a host of others. CPS routinely employs unconstitutional actions, fraud, extortion, deceit, kidnapping, and conspiracy in an ongoing criminal enterprise designed to cheat the public and destroy the families of the United States of America for profit, for agrandizement and to delude the public into thinking their actions are for the general welfare of this nation. Unconstitutional summary judicial proceedings designed to perpetrate for-profit crimes against humanity, family dismemberment and human trafficking, and to defraud the Federal Government for Social Services Agency operational funds have been perpetrated upon many families in America. 


 

Definition of Child Trafficking Elements

· A child - a person under the age of 18;

· Traffic - Recruitment, transportation, transfer, harbouring or receipt, whether by force or not, by a third person or group;

· The third person or group organizes the recruitment and/or these other acts for exploitative purposes;

· Movement may not be a constituent element for trafficking in so far as law enforcement and prosecution is concerned. However, an element of movement within a country or across borders is needed - even if minimal - in order to distinguish trafficking from other forms of slavery and slave-like practices enumerated in Art 3 (a) of ILO Convention 182, and ensure that trafficking victims separated from their families do get needed assistance;

· Exploitation includes:

1. all forms of slavery or practices similar to slavery, debt bondage and serfdom and forced or compulsory labour, including forced or compulsory recruitment of children for use in armed conflict [Convention 182, Art. 3(a)];

2. the use, procuring or offering of a child for prostitution, for the production of pornography or for pornographic performances [Convention No. 182, Art. 3(b)];

3. the use, procuring or offering of a child for illicit activities, in particular for the production and trafficking of drugs as defined in the relevant international treaties [Convention No. 182, Art. 3(c)];

4. work which, by its nature or the circumstances in which it is carried out, is likely to harm the health, safety or morals of children (Convention No. 182, Art. 3(d) and Convention No. 138, Art 3);

5. work done by children below the minimum age for admission to employment (Convention No. 138, Art. 2 & 7).

· Threat or use of force or other forms of coercion, abduction, fraud or deception, or the abuse of power or a position of vulnerability at any point of the recruitment and movement do not need to be present in case of children (other than with adults), but are nevertheless strong indications of child trafficking.

 

Criminalization of Human Trafficking and Smuggling in National Laws

The Trafficking Protocol statute prohibits the "buying, selling or bartering" of a person for money or any other consideration. It also prohibits certain specific acts that "promote, facilitate or induce the buying, selling or bartering or placement in adoption of any person for money or any other consideration, although these relate mostly to acquiring children for illicit adoption.

 




--
Nancy Schaefer
nancy.schaefer@nancyschaefer.com





 

 

From: AngelFury@AngelFury.org [mailto:AngelFury@AngelFury.org]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 7:43 PM
To: 'Marlene Jones'
Subject: RE: legislative power

 

I agree with you and the any one including the FBI has the power to investigate.

 Personally ANYONE who does NOT take these matters serious and in fact go the extra haul to make sure it DOESN’T happen is really showing that they- have a lot to lose and it is not the ‘peoples vote’ I will send it out to make sure but you have it right dear.

 

  

Oneal fought tooth and nail last year with mike and I on just simple linguistics- it is apparent his bread is buttered and jammed the wrong way. Let me know how it goes in fact I can put all their email on line J

So keep writing them and if needed I will toss a email page with headers compilation for them.

 

Claudine

 

Comfort the disturbed, disturb the comfortable.

 

www.AngelFury.org

www.KS-FCRC.com

www.JusticeForMothers.com

www.KansansForJudicialAccountability.com

 

From: Marlene Jones [mailto:jonesma@sbcglobal.net]
Sent: Wednesday, February 18, 2009 10:18 AM
To: AngelFury@AngelFury.org
Subject: legislative power

 

Claudine

I had a conversation with Senator Morris in which he told me that his legislative cordinating council has no power - I said I beg to differ with you and would send him the statute and if i am wrong - pleas let me know. He never contacted me back.

Our legislators have power - they don't use it - O'neal has power to appoint a committee with subpoena powers toinvestigate the prosecutorial misconduct of the DA's office. falsifying documents etc. 

Maybe we all need to start sending him something to request that something is done here - or ask him what needs to be done to make sure that the rule of law is followed?..

I've heard that money is everything to O'Neal - He won't want the state sued.

Let me know what you think

Marlene

 

----- Original Message -----

From: Marlene Jones

To: morris@senate.state.ks.us

Sent: Tuesday, November 11, 2008 1:24 PM

Subject: Fw: 46-1222 Legislative Coordinating Council

 

Senator Morris -Chair of theLegislative Coordinating Council 

According to the statute the legislative coordinating council directs the legislative council in the case of quo warranto who shall have the same powers and standing in all courts as any county attorney, district attorney and attorney general has in any court.

I'm also including the statutes of quo warranto

Marlene Jones

316-729-7727

jonesma@sbcglobal.net

 

 

http://www.kslegislature.org/legsrv-statutes/getStatuteFile.do?number=/46-1222a.html

46-1222a

Chapter 46.--LEGISLATURE

Article 12.--LEGISLATIVE COORDINATING COUNCIL

 

   (f)   The legislative counsel shall represent the legislature, or either house thereof, in any school finance litigation or other cause or matter as directed by the legislative coordinating council. In cases of quo warranto and mandamus the legislative counsel shall have the same powers and standing in all courts of this state as any county attorney or district attorney has in such attorney's county or in the supreme court and as the attorney general has in any court. When the legislature is in session, either house thereof by its resolution, or both houses by concurrent resolution may authorize the legislative coordinating council to direct the legislative counsel to bring or participate in any cause or action by representing the legislature or either house thereof or the legislative coordinating council in any court of this state or of the United States. When the legislature is not in session, the legislative coordinating council may direct the legislative counsel to bring or participate in any cause or action by representing the legislature or either house thereof or the legislative coordinating council in any court of this state or of the United States in accordance with directions of the legislative coordinating council.

 

  Quo Warranto 60-1202 60-1203 60-1204 60-1205 60-1206 60-1207 60-1208

 

 

60-1205.   Grounds for forfeiture of public office. Every person holding any office of trust or profit, under and by virtue of any of the laws of the state of Kansas, either state, district, county, township or city office, except those subject to removal from office only by impeachment, who shall (1) willfully engage in misconduct while in office, (2) willfully neglect to perform any duty enjoined upon such person by law, (3) demonstrate mental impairment such that the person lacks the capacity to manage the office held, or (4) who shall commit any act constituting a violation of any penal statute involving moral turpitude, shall forfeit such person's office and shall be ousted from such office in the manner hereinafter provided.

      History:   L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-1205; L. 2003, ch. 127, § 10; July 1.

  60-1206.   Instituting ouster proceedings. (a) On complaint. The attorney general or any county attorney in the county of his or her jurisdiction, upon receiving written notice that an officer covered by K.S.A. 60-1205 has violated any of the provisions thereof, shall investigate the complaint. If reasonable cause is found for the complaint, proceedings shall be instituted to oust such officer, but proceedings may be initiated by the attorney general or the county attorney without complaint having been made.

  60-1207.   Suspension of officer during hearing. Upon application to the court before which the petition for ouster is pending, an officer may be suspended from performing any of the duties of his or her office, pending a final hearing and determination of the matter; and the authority having the power of appointment to fill vacancies in such office, shall upon such suspension appoint some proper person temporarily to fill said office and to carry on its duties until such matter shall be finally determined or until the successor of the officer so suspended shall be elected and shall have qualified. No person shall be suspended from office under the provisions of this act until at least five (5) days' notice of the application for the order of suspension shall be served upon such person, which notice shall set forth the time and place of the hearing of said application and said officer shall have the right to appear and make any defense that he or she may have and shall be entitled to a full hearing upon the charges contained in the complaint and upon the application for the order. No suspension shall be made except upon finding of good cause therefor. If on the final hearing the officer is not removed from office, the officer shall receive the salary allowed by law during the time of his or her suspension. The officer so temporarily appointed shall receive the same salary as is provided by law to be paid the officer filling such position.

      History:   L. 1963, ch. 303, 60-1207; Jan. 1, 1964.