October 30, 2008  The Kansas Judicial Review has released a statement slamming District Attorney Nola Foulston, stating that she has allowed her relationship with late-term abortionist George R. Tiller to “interfere with her prosecutorial judgment.”
The statement, written by KJR Chairman Richard J. Peckham, openly links Tiller to Foulston through the adoption of Foulston’s now-adult son, Andrew. Peckham states: Her adopted son, now an adult, apparently came to her through the services of George Tiller. Although the probate adoption records are not available to the public, and this writer has never seen that Court record, there is ample circumstantial evidence to support a reasonable belief that Tiller shrewdly presented the adoption opportunity to Nola in order to neutralize the DA for purposes of protecting himself against potential prosecution for violation of abortion practice rules. Peckham makes three points as to why he believes the Foulston-Tiller adoption story is credible. · At the time of the adoption, it was common knowledge that Foulston adopted her son from Tiller, suggesting that she made the information public by sharing it with a number of people in her office. · Neither Foulston nor Tiller have denied that the adoption took place, as commonly believed. · Tiller told a newspaper in Oklahoma that it was his practice to provide adoptions for those who were pro-choice and were supportive of his abortion business. Peckham stated that Foulston should have recused herself from participation in any Tiller prosecution because of the appearance of a conflict of interest. “Instead, in my opinion, she chose to obstruct justice, refusing to file charges against Tiller, despite credible evidence of alleged violations of the law. Her performance breeds disrespect for the judicial system,” said Peckham. In addition, Peckham criticized Foulston for “cheating the tax payers by spending inadequate time performing her official duties” and for conducting “desperate and misleading smear tactics, including alleged misuse of private police records, [in an] attempt to hide the truth that her election opponent, Mark Schoenhofer, is a good family man and father, and a fine lawyer with substantial experience in criminal law.” “It’s time for a change,” he concluded. Kansans for Truth in Politics applauds the courage of Mr. Peckham and the Kansas Judicial Review for coming forward and voicing concerns about Foulston and her connections to Tiller that the people of Wichita have long suspected, but have been afraid to mention because of Foulston’s vindictive nature. “We agree with the Kansas Judicial Review,” said K-TIP Chairperson Cheryl Sullenger. “It is time for a change.” Read the full statement from the Kansas Judicial Review. http://k-tip.org/foulston.htm
Bambi Hazen seeking Justice in Unjust
Sedgwick County Kansas Case. No 08 JC 371
"In the Interest of Ashton"
www.countyinneedofchange.blogspot.com
www.myspace/mom_haz |